The world’s largest free audio library for everyday wellbeing
The world’s largest free audio library for everyday wellbeing
Sound-Based
Receptive silence is a contemplative sound practice in which you sit in deliberate stillness and hold an open, panoramic awareness of the whole soundscape, letting sounds arise and pass without seeking, labelling, or interpreting them.
Last Updated
4 Jul 2026
We are still reviewing this page. Our research team checks every technique page for accuracy and evidence quality before final release. Details may change as that review completes. The evidence badge shows our current reading of the published research.
RECOMMENDED DOSE
No direct dose-response literature exists for this technique; the available references address unrelated topics (selective mutism and general mindfulness programs) and report no session length or frequency for Receptive Silence. This short, low-commitment starting dose follows general conventions for silent meditation practices. No direct dose evidence; editorial synthesis.
No cited source reports a dose for Receptive Silence. This step-up reflects a typical established-practice level for silent meditation and should be treated as a starting point only. No direct dose evidence; editorial synthesis.
No direct dose-response literature supports this maintenance level. It reflects common expert-practitioner conventions for a sustained silent meditation habit and should be approached gradually. No direct dose evidence; editorial synthesis.
Session length
Session length: 5–10 minutes
5
MIN
How long each individual practice session should last from start to finish.
Frequency
Frequency: 3–4 days
3
DAYS
The number of days per week to fit a session into your routine.
Session length
Session length: 15–20 minutes
15
MIN
How long each individual practice session should last from start to finish.
Frequency
Frequency: 5 days
5
DAYS
The number of days per week to fit a session into your routine.
Session length
Session length: 30–45 minutes
30
MIN
How long each individual practice session should last from start to finish.
Frequency
Frequency: 6–7 days
6
DAYS
The number of days per week to fit a session into your routine.
About this card. No direct dose-response literature exists for this technique. These recommendations are based on general practice conventions for silent meditation and should be treated as starting points only. These recommendations are not a substitute for personalised guidance from a qualified practitioner.
Quick answers to what people most often ask. Each card links to the deeper section below.
evidence
Evidence for receptive silence is limited and indirect, drawn entirely from related practices rather than silence itself. Cochrane meta-analyses of music-based listening report eased anxiety in cancer and dementia care, and a review of pandemic-era distress found meditation lowered anxiety. No trial has tested silence alone, so results are a promising signal, not proof.
Read moregood for
Adults who feel wired, overstimulated, or unable to quiet a busy mind may find receptive silence a supportive kind of rest. The closest evidence comes from meditation and music-based practices in groups such as cancer patients, people in dementia care, and stressed students. It is not a substitute for care when anxiety, depression, trauma, or grief feel overwhelming.
Read moresafety
Most healthy adults can practise receptive silence safely, with no known physical hazards. People carrying recent trauma, acute grief, or conditions where quiet, inward attention intensifies distressing thoughts should take a lighter approach: shorter sessions or professional support. Sitting with nothing to follow can let restlessness or strong feelings surface, a practice-informed caution rather than a documented risk.
Read morehow it works
Receptive silence appears to work by lowering the stream of external sound until the nervous system stops bracing for the next input, shifting toward the body's rest-and-recovery mode. Heart rate slows and breathing eases, while attention tunes toward subtler layers of the soundscape. These pathways are inferred from meditation and music research, not measured in silence itself.
Read moreReceptive silence is the practice of sitting in deliberate quiet and listening openly to the whole soundscape, treating silence itself as something to attend to rather than focusing on any single sound.
A session is simple in form. You sit in a still, unhurried posture and hold a wide, panoramic awareness of the entire soundscape, letting sounds arise and fade without seeking, naming, or interpreting them. Where focused sound meditation rests attention on one chosen sound, receptive silence keeps attention open at the threshold where sound and silence meet, treating the quiet itself as something to listen into. It is practised as the receptive complement to active sound work.
Receptive silence is not focused sound meditation, which holds attention on one sound, and it is not simply the absence of noise or a way of doing nothing, because the silence is treated as a presence to listen into. It is also unrelated to clinical conditions involving silence such as selective mutism, despite the shared word. Think of it as open, panoramic listening rather than concentration on a single object.
Not to be confused with
Selective mutism
Selective mutism is a childhood anxiety disorder in which a person is unable to speak in certain social situations despite being able to speak elsewhere. It is a clinical condition needing professional care, not a chosen listening practice, and shares only the word silence.
Silent retreat or vow of silence
A silent retreat or vow of silence is about not speaking, a discipline of restraint over one's own voice. Receptive silence is about actively listening into the surrounding quiet; speaking is beside the point, and the focus is on what the ear can notice.
Sensory deprivation or float tanks
Sensory deprivation aims to remove input altogether, cutting off sound, light, and touch. Receptive silence keeps the ordinary environment and turns toward its faint remaining sounds, sharpening perception rather than shutting it down.
Receptive silence appears to work by lowering the stream of external sound until the nervous system stops bracing for the next input, a shift toward what researchers call parasympathetic activation, the body's rest-and-recovery mode that many people feel as tension easing and breathing slowing (Lekagul et al., 2022). As sound drops away, attention also tunes toward subtler layers of the soundscape, a sharpening of sensory attention that can make the quiet feel unexpectedly full rather than empty. These processes are drawn from research on meditation and music-based listening rather than trials of silence itself, so they describe a plausible path, not a measured one.
As outside sound drops away and the nervous system stops bracing for the next noise, racing thoughts and physical tension can ease, a settling researchers call arousal downregulation. Meditation and mindfulness practices that share this quiet, receptive quality have repeatedly been linked to lower anxiety and stress (Lekagul et al., 2022).
In the body, receptive silence is expected to slow the heart rate and ease breathing as the rest-and-recovery branch of the nervous system becomes more active, changes many people feel as a softening in the chest and a pulse that seems to quiet and steady (Bradt et al., 2016). These directions are inferred from music-based listening practices rather than measured in silence itself, and one group-listening trial could not reliably track heart-rate variability, the beat-to-beat variation that reflects how balanced the nervous system is, so no autonomic change has been confirmed for silence specifically (Rachael et al., 2023).
As you settle into deep listening, the pulse often feels like it quiets and steadies rather than races. Heart rate is expected to ease downward as the body shifts toward its rest-and-recovery branch, a direction inferred from music-based practices where small reductions in heart rate have been recorded; receptive silence itself has not been measured directly (Bradt et al., 2016).
Breathing tends to lengthen and the chest softens as you settle into quiet listening. Respiratory rate, the number of breaths you take each minute, has not been measured in receptive silence itself, though small reductions appear in related sound-based practices (Bradt et al., 2016), a shift many people feel as the breath slowing.
When the body's rest-and-recovery system, the parasympathetic branch, takes over, you may feel tension drain from the shoulders and jaw and your pulse soften. Blood pressure itself has not been measured during Receptive Silence, so any easing is inferred from music-based listening practices, where small reductions have been reported alongside lower anxiety (Bradt et al., 2016).
Limited, indirect evidence supports receptive silence, and all of it comes from close-cousin practices rather than silence studied on its own. In research on music-based listening and mindfulness, not receptive silence specifically, anxiety and low mood eased in a way people often describe as the mind quieting and the body unclenching. A review in cancer patients found a moderate-to-large drop in anxiety, and a review in dementia care found smaller but consistent reductions in anxiety and depressed mood (Bradt et al., 2016), (Steen et al., 2017), (Lekagul et al., 2022). What is not yet supported is any direct trial of silence itself, any lasting or large effect, or any claim that it can replace care for a diagnosed condition.
Receptive silence has not been tested on its own, so the findings come from related practices: reviews of music-based listening report eased anxiety in cancer and dementia care, and a review of pandemic-era mental health found meditation and mindfulness practices repeatedly lowered anxiety (Bradt et al., 2016), (Steen et al., 2017), (Lekagul et al., 2022). In those studies people commonly describe anxiety easing and the body settling into a calmer state. This evidence is real but indirect and mostly modest in quality, drawn from groups and formats that differ from solitary silent listening, so it is best read as a promising signal rather than proof about silence specifically.
0
Meta-analyses
0
RCTs
1
Systematic reviews
0
Observational
3
Pilot
Studied populations
Outcomes measured
| Outcome | Effect size | 95% CI | N | Comparator | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| anxiety | SMD = -0.43 | 95% CI -0.72 to -0.14 | 478 | usual care or other activities | Steen et al., 2017 |
| depressive symptoms | SMD = -0.27 | 95% CI -0.45 to -0.09 | 503 | — | Steen et al., 2017 |
| anxiety | SMD = -0.71 | 95% CI -0.98 to -0.43 | 1,028 | — | Bradt et al., 2016 |
The biggest gap is that no study has tested receptive silence on its own; everything here is inferred from meditation and music-based practices in different populations, so the size and reliability of any effect for silence remain unknown. Its effect on the body's calming responses is also unconfirmed, since one group-listening trial could not reliably measure heart-rate variability, the beat-to-beat changes that reflect how settled the nervous system is, and drew no conclusion. This leaves receptive silence a supportive practice that may help some people settle, not a replacement for care.
Living through the psychological consequences of COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review of effective mitigating interventions
2022
Finding: This review gathered 29 studies of programs designed to ease the mental strain of the COVID-19 pandemic, and most of the anxiety and stress programs turned out to be built on mindfulness and meditation. Among the controlled trials, 10 of 11 lowered anxiety and 5 of 6 reduced depression, so the meditation family that receptive silence belongs to has a fairly consistent track record for calming a stressed mind. Keep in mind this looked at meditation practices broadly rather than silence on its own, and the studies focused on pandemic-era distress across general adults, healthcare workers, and people recovering from COVID-19, so it speaks to the wider approach more than to silent practice specifically.
reported narratively
Music-based therapeutic interventions for people with dementia
2017
Finding: This Cochrane review pooled trials of music-based therapy for people with dementia living in care settings, and across 13 studies with 478 participants it found a small-to-moderate drop in anxiety, alongside a modest reduction in depressive symptoms drawn from 11 studies of 503 people. In practical terms, structured musical practices appear to ease worry and low mood for this group, which hints at the wider calming potential of sound and attentive listening. One important limit: this evidence is about music-based interventions that usually blend both making and receiving music, not about receptive silence on its own, so it speaks to the technique only indirectly. The certainty behind these results ranges from low to moderate, and the findings come specifically from institutionalised adults with dementia rather than the general population.
SMD = -0.43
Music interventions for improving psychological and physical outcomes in cancer patients
n = 1,028
Finding: Across 13 trials with more than 1,000 cancer patients, this Cochrane review found that music-based interventions meaningfully lowered anxiety, along with small reductions in heart rate, breathing rate and blood pressure. For someone drawn to receptive silence, this hints that structured attention to sound, or its absence, may help settle the body and ease worry, though the evidence is only indirectly related. Two important limits: these studies looked at music listening and music therapy rather than silence itself, and the trials were mostly low quality, so this is best read as suggestive background rather than direct proof that receptive silence calms the nervous system.
SMD = -0.71
Online group music therapy: proactive management of undergraduate students' stress and anxiety.
2023
Finding: In an online trial with university students during the pandemic, single 45-minute group sessions of receptive music listening lowered both anxiety and self-rated stress by the end of each session, and the drop was on par with what standard talk-based support achieved. Over six weeks, though, the effects looked more modest: everyday stress ratings held steady, and while a stress-hormone marker climbed in the no-treatment group it stayed level in those who took part, so the practice may have helped buffer against rising stress rather than actively reducing it. One planned measure of nervous-system calm could not be assessed because the remote recordings were unreliable, so this study cannot show that quiet listening shifts heart-rate patterns. Keep in mind that the receptive sessions here involved listening to music, not sitting in silence, so it speaks only indirectly to receptive silence as a standalone practice.
reported narratively
Receptive silence grows out of contemplative traditions that treat silence as the still point from which all sound emerges and into which it returns, the receptive complement to active sound practice. In this framing, sitting in apparent emptiness becomes listening to something rather than doing nothing. These roots help explain the practice's form, its open, unhurried listening at the threshold where sound and silence meet, not its clinical effects.
For most healthy adults, receptive silence is a gentle, low-risk practice with no known physical hazards. A few situations call for a lighter touch. Sitting with open, inward attention and nothing to follow can let restlessness, louder thoughts, or strong feelings rise to the surface, which many people experience as the quiet growing loud rather than calming. This is a practice-informed caution rather than a measured safety risk, and it usually eases with a shorter, gentler session. Silence's calming reputation is also borrowed from research on related practices such as meditation and music listening rather than studies of silence itself, so it is best treated as a supportive practice, not a treatment (Lekagul et al., 2022), (Rachael et al., 2023).
People carrying recent trauma, acute grief, or conditions where quiet, inward attention tends to intensify distressing thoughts may find that extended silence stirs up more than it settles. Because this is a practice-informed caution, a shorter session or the steadying presence of a qualified professional can make those histories feel safer to sit with. Anyone hoping silence will shift a specific physical marker such as heart-rate variability, the measure of how flexibly the nervous system moves between alertness and rest, should know that reliable autonomic effects have not been established (Rachael et al., 2023), and receptive silence is not a substitute for treatment of a diagnosed condition.
Sitting with open, inward attention and nothing to follow can let restlessness, louder thoughts, or strong feelings rise to the surface, which many people experience as the quiet growing loud rather than calming. This is a practice-informed caution rather than a measured safety risk, and it usually eases with a shorter, gentler session. Try five to ten minutes, keep your eyes open, or add a soft background sound if the silence feels too big.
For people carrying recent trauma, acute grief, or conditions where quiet, inward attention tends to intensify distressing thoughts, extended silence can stir up more than it settles. This is a practice-informed caution, not a studied safety finding. Keep sessions brief, stay in a setting that feels safe, and consider the steadying presence of a qualified professional so those histories feel safer to sit with. Silence is a complement to care, never a replacement for treatment.
Anyone hoping silence will shift a specific physical marker such as heart-rate variability, the measure of how flexibly the nervous system moves between alertness and rest, should know that reliable autonomic effects have not been established. One group-listening trial could not reliably track heart-rate variability and drew no autonomic conclusion, so treat any calming as a supportive experience rather than a proven physiological change.
Receptive silence is best approached as a supportive practice rather than a treatment, given gently and in small doses so you can learn how open, inward quiet actually feels for you. A sensible starting format is a brief sit of just a few minutes in a familiar, comfortable spot where you will not be startled, with full permission to soften the practice or stop entirely if what surfaces feels like too much. Keep the listening loose rather than effortful, and if the quiet consistently stirs up more than it settles, it is worth involving a qualified professional.
Begin with just five to ten minutes. Brief sessions let you learn how open silence feels for you before you sit with it longer, which is the safest way to notice whether the quiet soothes or unsettles you.
Pick a familiar, comfortable spot where you will not be startled or interrupted. Feeling physically secure makes it easier to let attention soften rather than stay braced for the next sound.
Settle into an unhurried sitting posture and simply receive whatever arises within the quiet, without chasing, naming, or judging it. If the mind speeds up, that is normal; keep the listening loose and panoramic rather than effortful.
If restlessness or difficult feelings rise, treat them as ordinary rather than a sign of doing it wrong. You can shorten the sit, open your eyes, or add a gentle background sound at any time; there is no need to push through distress.
After longer sits, come back slowly, letting your eyes open, your breathing return to normal, and your body reorient before you stand. This matters most if you feel light-headed or very settled.
If quiet, inward attention consistently stirs up trauma, grief, or overwhelming thoughts, involve a qualified professional and use silence as a complement to that care, not a replacement for it.
This information is educational and is not medical advice. This practice is not a substitute for professional care and should not replace prescribed medication or treatment for any medical or mental-health condition. If you are managing a health condition or taking medication, talk with a qualified health professional before changing your practice. If you are in distress or crisis, seek professional support.
| Technique | Best for | Use with care | Evidence strength | Distinction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focused sound meditation | A busy or scattered mind that settles more easily when it has one steady anchor to return to. | emerging EVIDENCE | Focused sound meditation fixes attention on a single chosen object, one tone, a mantra, or a bell, and returns to it whenever the mind wanders. Receptive silence does the opposite: it holds an open, panoramic awareness of the whole soundscape and treats the quiet itself as something to listen into, without selecting or following any one sound. | |
| Receptive music listening (music therapy) | People who find a calming external sound easier to settle with than open, unstructured quiet. | moderate EVIDENCE | Receptive music listening uses recorded or live music as the object of attention, giving the ear a soothing external sound to rest on. Receptive silence removes that external anchor and turns attention toward the subtle acoustic texture within apparent quiet. Much of what we can say about silence is borrowed from this closely related music-based research rather than from studies of silence itself. | |
| Open-monitoring mindfulness meditation | General anxiety and stress relief where a reader wants the practice family with the most supporting research. | moderate EVIDENCE | Open-monitoring mindfulness widens awareness across all of experience, thoughts, sensations, sounds, and breath, without fixing on any one. Receptive silence is a narrower relative that keeps that open, non-grasping stance but points it specifically at the soundscape and the threshold where sound meets silence. Mindfulness carries the larger research base of the two. | |
| Sound bath | People who want an enveloping, sensory-rich experience rather than open, minimally stimulating quiet. | emerging EVIDENCE | A sound bath immerses the listener in continuous resonant tones from gongs, bowls, or chimes, filling the space with sustained vibration. Receptive silence works from the other direction, lowering external sound until faint, previously unnoticed detail becomes audible. One fills the ear; the other empties it and listens into what remains. |
No. Receptive silence is an active practice of open, panoramic listening, not passive rest or empty quiet. You sit still and let whatever faint sounds arise within the apparent quiet come to you, treating the silence itself as something to listen into rather than nothing to do.
+
No. Although it looks like sitting quietly, receptive silence asks for a wide, unhurried attention across the whole soundscape, from a room's faint hum to the movement of air, without chasing, labelling, or interpreting any single sound. In contemplative traditions this quiet is framed as a fullness to listen into rather than an absence to endure, which is what sets it apart from ordinary rest or focused sound meditation. This describes the form of the practice as it is taught, not a claim about any clinical effect.
Possibly, but only indirectly. No study has tested silence itself for anxiety; its calming reputation is borrowed from mindfulness and music-based listening research, where anxiety eased (Lekagul et al., 2022), (Bradt et al., 2016). Treat it as gentle support for settling, not a treatment for diagnosed anxiety.
+
Possibly, but the evidence is indirect. Receptive silence has never been trialled on its own, so any anxiety benefit is inferred from closely related practices: reviews of meditation and mindfulness link them to lower anxiety (Lekagul et al., 2022), music-based listening reduced anxiety in cancer and dementia care (Bradt et al., 2016), (Steen et al., 2017), and a group music-listening trial eased short-term stress and anxiety (Rachael et al., 2023). That makes silence a plausible support for settling rather than a proven anxiety treatment, and it is not a substitute for care when anxiety feels overwhelming.
No. Receptive silence has not been tested as its own intervention; the supporting evidence is indirect, borrowed from meditation and music-based listening studied in other groups, so its effect size and reliability for silence itself remain unknown (Lekagul et al., 2022).
+
No. No trial has isolated receptive silence as a standalone practice, so everything described about it is inferred from related practices. Reviews of music-based listening report eased anxiety and low mood in cancer care and dementia care (Bradt et al., 2016), (Steen et al., 2017), and mindfulness and meditation have repeatedly been linked to lower anxiety and stress (Lekagul et al., 2022). For silence specifically, that calming signal is suggestive but not yet confirmed, so it is best read as a supportive practice rather than proof.
Likely because quiet lowers external input, so the nervous system stops bracing for the next sound and can shift toward its rest-and-recovery, parasympathetic mode, which many people feel as tension easing. This pathway is drawn from meditation research, not proven for silence itself (Lekagul et al., 2022).
+
The calming feeling most likely comes from the nervous system settling as external input falls away. As sound drops away, the body may stop bracing for the next input and shift toward parasympathetic activation, the rest-and-recovery state that many people feel as slower breathing and softening tension; attention also settles as it tunes to subtler layers of sound. This pathway is inferred from meditation and music-based research rather than trials of silence itself, and one group-listening study could not reliably measure heart-rate variability, a marker of nervous-system balance, so no autonomic effect is confirmed for silence specifically (Lekagul et al., 2022), (Rachael et al., 2023).
Possibly, but it has not been measured directly. Quiet, low-stimulation sitting may shift the body toward its rest-and-recovery, parasympathetic mode, felt as slower breathing and a steadier pulse. This is inferred from meditation and music-based research, not silence itself, and reliable changes are not established (Rachael et al., 2023).
+
Possibly, though it has not been measured directly. When external sound drops away, the nervous system can stop bracing for the next input and shift toward parasympathetic activation, the rest-and-recovery branch that many people feel as slower breathing and a calmer, steadier pulse, so a modest slowing of heart rate is a reasonable expectation. That direction comes from studies of music-based listening and meditation rather than trials of silence itself (Bradt et al., 2016), and one group-listening trial could not reliably track heart-rate variability, the beat-to-beat timing changes that reflect how flexibly the nervous system settles, so no autonomic effect is confirmed for silence specifically (Rachael et al., 2023). Treat it as a supportive mechanism, not a measured or proven one.
Yes. Open, inward silence can let restlessness, louder thoughts, or strong feelings rise before things settle, and the quiet can feel unexpectedly loud at first. This is a practice-informed caution rather than a measured harm, and it usually eases with shorter, gentler sessions.
+
Yes. With nothing external to follow, receptive silence sometimes surfaces restlessness or difficult emotions, and many people notice the quiet feeling loud before it feels calming. This reflects practitioner experience rather than a documented safety risk, so no harm has been measured. It generally settles with a shorter, gentler approach, and where recent trauma or acute grief are present, a briefer session or the steadying presence of a qualified professional can help.
Use care. For most healthy adults receptive silence is low-risk, but with recent trauma or acute grief, quiet, inward attention can intensify distressing thoughts and stir up more than it settles. This is a practice-informed caution, not a studied safety finding; start short and gentle, and involve a qualified professional if quiet unsettles you.
+
Use care. No trial has tested the safety of receptive silence, or silent meditation, specifically for people carrying trauma or grief, so this caution comes from practice experience rather than measured safety outcomes (Lekagul et al., 2022). Because open, inward attention with nothing to follow can let strong feelings rise, keep sessions brief, stay in a setting that feels safe, open your eyes or add a gentle background sound if needed, and stop whenever distress builds. If quiet consistently stirs up overwhelming thoughts, work with a qualified professional and treat silence as a complement to that care, not a replacement for treatment.
Start with about five to ten minutes. Brief sessions let you notice whether the quiet soothes or unsettles you before sitting longer, and you can extend gradually as the practice feels more comfortable. This is a practice-informed starting point, not a studied or optimal dose.
+
Start short, at roughly five to ten minutes, then extend gradually with repeated practice. Brief sessions are the gentlest way to learn how open silence feels for you, since quiet, inward attention soothes some people and unsettles others. This is practice-informed guidance rather than an evidence-based dose: receptive silence has not been tested on its own, so no trial establishes an ideal session length. If restlessness or difficult feelings rise, you can shorten the sit or open your eyes at any point.
The difference is where attention rests. Receptive silence holds open, panoramic awareness of the whole soundscape and treats the quiet itself as something to listen into, while focused sound meditation fixes on one object, a tone, mantra, or bell, and returns to it whenever the mind wanders.
+
The difference is a matter of practice form, not proven effectiveness, since no head-to-head trial has compared the two. Receptive silence holds a wide, non-grasping attention across the entire field of sound, letting sounds arise and pass without selecting any single one. Focused sound meditation does the opposite: it anchors attention on one chosen object and returns to it each time the mind drifts, which can suit a busy or scattered mind that settles more easily with a steady anchor to come back to.
The ability to sense and follow what is happening in the outside world through the senses, especially sound in this practice. It shows up as noticing the environment with unusual clarity and detail.
Conscious perception and interpretation of external environmental stimuli received through the sensory modalities, distinct from interoception.
The sense of what is happening inside the body, such as heartbeat, breath, or muscle tension. It is the inward counterpart to exteroceptive awareness, which faces outward toward the environment.
A shift toward the body's rest-and-recovery branch of the nervous system, which calms the fight-or-flight response. It tends to feel like tension easing, breathing slowing, and a steadier sense of being settled.
Increased activity in the parasympathetic nervous system, largely via vagal pathways, moving physiology away from sympathetic arousal toward recovery.
The gradual sharpening of attention so that faint details, previously below notice, become vivid and discernible. In silence it feels like the ears tuning until subtle sounds separate out from the background.
Perceptual learning that improves the resolution and sensitivity of attention directed to sensory experience, supporting finer sensory discrimination.
The small beat-to-beat differences in the timing of the heartbeat, often read as a marker of how flexibly the nervous system shifts between alertness and calm. Studies of quiet listening have not reliably shown that this changes during practice.
The full field of sound present in a given moment and place, from obvious noises to faint background texture. Receptive silence attends to the whole soundscape at once rather than to any single sound within it.
Angkana Lekagul, Peeraya Piancharoen, Anamika Chattong, Chawisa Suradom, Viroj Tangcharoensathien (2022). Living through the psychological consequences of COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review of effective mitigating interventions. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060804
Cited in: Benefits, How it works, Research, Use with care
Jenny T. van der Steen, Mirjam C. van Soest‐Poortvliet, Johannes C. van der Wouden, Manon S Bruinsma, Rob Scholten, Annemieke Vink (2017). Music-based therapeutic interventions for people with dementia. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd003477.pub3
Joke Bradt, Cheryl Dileo, Lucanne Magill, Aaron K. Teague (2016). Music interventions for improving psychological and physical outcomes in cancer patients. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd006911.pub3
Cited in: Benefits, Research, What happens in the body
Finnerty Rachael, McWeeny Sean, Trainor Laurel (2023). Online group music therapy: proactive management of undergraduate students' stress and anxiety.. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1183311
Editorially curated. Tracks are not themselves clinically studied; evidence on the page applies to Receptive Silence as a technique.
Explore guided sessions to deepen your Receptive Silence technique.
Beginner content for Receptive Silence

★ 4.8
·
Guided
·
16 min
Annemaree Rowley
How hard is Receptive Silence?
Receptive silence is the softest row in this family and should keep the low contemplative floor.
1
Mental Effort
1 / 4
▾Emotional Depth
1 / 4
▾Physical Intensity
1 / 4
▾Prior Knowledge
1 / 4
▾