The world’s largest free audio library for everyday wellbeing
The world’s largest free audio library for everyday wellbeing
Psychological & Psychotherapy
Attention Training Technique (ATT) is a brief, guided auditory exercise from metacognitive therapy that trains flexible, voluntary control of attention by having you focus on, switch between, and divide attention across competing sounds (Knowles et al., 2016).
Last Updated
4 Jul 2026
We are still reviewing this page. Our research team checks every technique page for accuracy and evidence quality before final release. Details may change as that review completes. The evidence badge shows our current reading of the published research.
RECOMMENDED DOSE
Randomised controlled trials describe the Attention Training Technique as a standardised 12-minute auditory exercise, which is a manageable starting session length. A gentle 2–3 times per week schedule is an editorial starting point, as the trials did not report a specific weekly frequency for new practitioners.
The core 12-minute session length is the dose used in ATT trials, and study protocols often ran over roughly one-to-two weeks with repeated sessions and homework practice. The specific 4–5 times per week frequency is an editorial synthesis, as the studies reported session counts rather than a defined weekly cadence.
The 12-minute session length remains the trial-validated dose, and several studies incorporated homework practice to embed the skill in everyday life. Daily practice as a maintenance level is an editorial recommendation; the referenced trials did not test a specific long-term daily frequency.
Session length
Session length: About 12 minutes
10
MIN
How long each individual practice session should last from start to finish.
Frequency
Frequency: 2–3 days
2
DAYS
The number of days per week to fit a session into your routine.
Session length
Session length: About 12 minutes
12
MIN
How long each individual practice session should last from start to finish.
Frequency
Frequency: 4–5 days
4
DAYS
The number of days per week to fit a session into your routine.
Session length
Session length: About 12 minutes
12
MIN
How long each individual practice session should last from start to finish.
Frequency
Frequency: 6–7 days
6
DAYS
The number of days per week to fit a session into your routine.
About this card. Session length reflects the 12-minute exercise used in Attention Training Technique trials, while weekly frequency is an editorial synthesis where trials did not specify a cadence. These recommendations are not a substitute for personalised guidance from a qualified practitioner.
Quick answers to what people most often ask. Each card links to the deeper section below.
evidence
A systematic review and controlled trials link the Attention Training Technique to promising, moderate-to-large reductions in anxiety and depressive symptoms, with about three-quarters of patients in one meta-analysis recovered or holding gains at follow-up. Most samples are small and often nonclinical, and one trial found no benefit for worry in generalized anxiety disorder.
good for
Adults and students dealing with stress, worry that loops back on itself, or anxiety and depressive symptoms may benefit from the Attention Training Technique, which has been studied in stressed university students and high-worry adults. It builds a trainable attention skill rather than replacing professional care for severe or diagnosed conditions.
Read moresafety
Most healthy adults can practise the Attention Training Technique as a low-risk listening exercise, with no adverse effects reported in the studies reviewed. Anyone managing a diagnosed mental-health condition, psychosis, or trauma-related intrusive thoughts should use it alongside professional care, not instead of it. Pause and check in with a clinician if practice consistently increases distress.
Read morehow it works
Repeatedly focusing on, switching between, and dividing attention across competing sounds strengthens flexible, voluntary control of attention, the capacity to place focus where you choose and steer it back when it drifts. Brain-imaging studies show increased activity in the frontoparietal network that directs voluntary attention, and a shift away from inward, worry-scanning self-focus toward the outside world.
Read moreA short guided listening exercise from metacognitive therapy that trains you to focus on, switch between, and divide your attention across competing everyday sounds (Knowles et al., 2016).
A typical session runs about 12 minutes and is guided by audio. You listen to several everyday sounds at once and move through three timed phases: selective attention, holding focus on one sound while the others continue; attention switching, shifting focus between sounds on cue; and divided attention, trying to take in all the sounds together. Task demand rises as you go, and practitioners are usually asked to repeat the exercise as homework so the skill carries into daily life (Haukaas et al., 2018).
ATT is a secular clinical exercise, not a meditation or relaxation practice. Unlike mindfulness or body-scan approaches that turn attention inward toward breath and bodily sensation, ATT deliberately trains attention outward onto external sounds, and it is not designed to induce calm; sessions often feel effortful. It also differs from attentional bias modification, which retrains what people attend to rather than building flexible control over where attention goes. ATT is one component of metacognitive therapy, not a full course of therapy on its own.
Not to be confused with
Metacognitive Therapy (MCT)
ATT is one component of Adrian Wells' metacognitive therapy, not the whole treatment. Full MCT also works with detached mindfulness, worry and rumination postponement, and direct challenges to metacognitive beliefs.
Mindfulness meditation
Both work with attention, but mindfulness cultivates open, accepting awareness of inner and outer experience, while ATT is a structured drill that pushes attention outward onto sounds and rehearses controlling it.
Attentional Bias Modification (ABM)
ABM retrains automatic, threat-related attention biases through repeated computer tasks; ATT trains deliberate, conscious control of attention through a guided listening exercise.
Distraction
ATT is not distraction or avoidance. It trains flexible, deliberate control over where attention goes rather than pushing thoughts away or numbing them, and studies deliberately separate it from distraction conditions.
ATT appears to work by strengthening flexible, voluntary control of attention, the capacity to place your focus where you choose and steer it back when it drifts. Repeatedly selecting, switching, and dividing attention across competing sounds trains that control, and in trials with students and high-worry adults, gains in attention flexibility travelled alongside feeling better (Haukaas et al., 2018), (Fernie et al., 2019). A second proposed route is a shift away from self-focused attention toward the outside world. Self-focused attention is the inward, threat-scanning style that worry feeds on, and laboratory studies suggest the exercise loosens that inward pull, though the link to lasting symptom change is still largely correlational (Fergus et al., 2014), (Fergus et al., 2018).
Attention Training gives you a clear sound to hold onto, so scattered, spiraling thoughts have a steadier place to land. Practising selecting, switching, and dividing your focus across competing sounds trains flexible control over where attention goes, and gains in that control tend to track with feeling better (Haukaas et al., 2018), (Fernie et al., 2019).
When a worry grabs your focus and won't let go, Attention Training rehearses shifting and redirecting attention on cue, building the flexibility to unhook your focus and move it where you choose. In studies, those gains in attention flexibility travelled alongside feeling better (Haukaas et al., 2018), (Fernie et al., 2019).
When worry loops inward, deliberately tuning in to the real sounds in the room gives attention an external anchor, and early studies suggest this pulls focus away from self-focused worry, the inward, threat-scanning style that rumination feeds on (Fergus et al., 2014), (Fergus et al., 2018). Many practitioners notice the surrounding world becoming more vivid and detailed as the inward pull eases.
Holding focus on one sound while others keep playing gives attention repeated practice at staying put, so the mind slips less readily into worry loops. In a randomized trial and a lab study, this kind of focused practice was linked to stronger attentional control, the ability to hold and steer where your focus goes, and those gains tended to travel alongside feeling better (Haukaas et al., 2018), (Fernie et al., 2019).
When worry takes over, attention narrows into a tight inward loop that crowds everything else out. Attention Training appears to widen that focus back outward toward sounds and surroundings, which can loosen the grip of rumination and leave more room to feel present again (Fergus et al., 2014), (Fergus et al., 2018).
Worry can feel like it grabs your attention on its own, without permission. Practising ATT builds meta-awareness, the sense that you are noticing and steering attention rather than being pulled by it; laboratory studies suggest the exercise reduces self-focused, threat-based processing, so thoughts start to feel more like something you can observe than something you are trapped inside (Fergus et al., 2014), (Fergus et al., 2018).
Worry can feel like it runs on its own, impossible to switch off. By practising focusing, switching, and dividing attention on cue, Attention Training Technique gives you direct proof that attention is yours to steer, which can loosen the belief that worry is uncontrollable and change how much weight a spiraling thought carries (Fergus et al., 2014), (Haukaas et al., 2018).
The most consistently measured change is increased activity in the frontoparietal network, the brain system that directs and holds voluntary attention. Across small EEG, fNIRS, and fMRI studies of mostly healthy volunteers, ATT increased resting alpha and beta oscillations and engaged these control regions during the exercise (Knowles & Wells, 2018), (Rosenbaum et al., 2018), (Schwarz et al., 2025), which practitioners tend to notice as attention becoming a little easier to steer. One sham-controlled brain-imaging study also linked the practice to faster attention shifting and altered activity in the anterior cingulate cortex, the region that flags conflict between competing mental demands, so redirecting focus can feel less like a tug-of-war (Jahn et al., 2023).
Attention can start to feel easier to steer, so moving focus off a worry and onto an outside sound takes less effort. Brain-imaging and EEG studies link this to increased activity in the frontoparietal network, the brain system that directs and holds voluntary attention (Knowles & Wells, 2018), (Rosenbaum et al., 2018), (Schwarz et al., 2025).
When focus keeps getting pulled back into worry, ATT trains the brain system that lets you steer attention on purpose. Brain-imaging and EEG studies measured increased activity in the frontoparietal networks, the brain's cognitive-control system that directs and holds voluntary focus, during and after the exercise (Knowles & Wells, 2018), (Rosenbaum et al., 2018), (Schwarz et al., 2025), and stronger engagement can feel like being able to place and hold attention rather than getting dragged into rumination.
During and after Attention Training Technique, steering focus away from a worry can start to feel a little easier and more deliberate. Brain-imaging and EEG studies link that shift to increased activity in the brain's attention-control networks, the frontal and parietal regions that help you direct focus on purpose (Knowles & Wells, 2018), (Rosenbaum et al., 2018), (Schwarz et al., 2025). One sham-controlled study also tied the practice to faster attention shifting and altered activity in the anterior cingulate cortex, the region that flags conflict between competing mental demands (Jahn et al., 2023).
Dragging your focus off a worry that keeps pulling it back can feel less like a struggle with practice. In a sham-controlled brain-imaging study, Attention Training Technique was linked to faster attention shifting and altered, generally lower activity in the anterior cingulate cortex, the region that flags conflict between competing mental demands (Jahn et al., 2023).
Being stuck on a single worried thought can loosen as attention becomes easier to move. Brain-imaging, EEG, and fNIRS studies measured increased activity in the frontoparietal control networks that support flexible, voluntary attention during and after the Attention Training Technique, along with faster shifting away from a fixed internal focus (Knowles & Wells, 2018), (Rosenbaum et al., 2018), (Jahn et al., 2023). People often describe this as a felt sense that attention can be redirected on purpose rather than staying locked on the same loop.
The clearest support is for anxiety and depressive symptoms: a systematic review of ten studies and a single-case meta-analysis both report sizable improvements, with most patients in the meta-analysis recovered or holding their gains at follow-up (Knowles et al., 2016), (Rochat et al., 2017). Emerging, single-trial evidence links ATT to lower perceived stress and less worry-about-worry in stressed students (Myhr et al., 2019), and limited evidence connects it to fewer intrusive thoughts after distressing experiences (Nassif & Wells, 2013). What is not yet supported: large randomized trials, long-term follow-up, and benefit for worry in diagnosed generalized anxiety disorder, where one controlled trial found no advantage over a comparison exercise (Stewart et al., 2021), and ATT does not replace treatment for a diagnosed condition.
When stress keeps looping back on itself, the worry about worrying can start to loosen with regular practice: in a controlled trial with stressed students, this brief guided listening exercise lowered perceived stress and meta-worry (Myhr et al., 2019). People often say their attention feels less stuck on threat and easier to steer back toward the sounds and surroundings in front of them.
Anxious tension can loosen as the practice trains attention to move off the worried, self-monitoring channel and back toward the outside world. A systematic review of ten studies found the Attention Training Technique produced promising, sizable reductions in anxiety and depressive symptoms (Knowles et al., 2016).
The worrying about how much you worry can start to quiet with regular practice. In one controlled study of stressed students, a short guided listening exercise lowered both perceived stress and this meta-worry, the anxious commentary that layers on top of worry itself (Myhr et al., 2019). Because that rests on a single small trial, treat it as an early, promising signal rather than a settled result.
Across a systematic review and several controlled trials, ATT shows moderate-to-large reductions in anxiety and depression, with adjusted Cohen's d ranging from 0.40 to 1.23 versus reference groups across analogue trials, meaning the typical trained participant ended up better off than roughly two-thirds to nearly nine in ten of those who did not train (Knowles et al., 2016). A single-case meta-analysis of metacognitive therapy and ATT found about three-quarters of patients recovered or maintained their gains at follow-up (Rochat et al., 2017). The main limits are that most samples are small and often nonclinical, and at least one randomized trial found ATT no better than a control condition for worry in adults with probable generalized anxiety disorder (Stewart et al., 2021).
1
Meta-analyses
4
RCTs
1
Systematic reviews
0
Observational
15
Pilot
Studied populations
Can the Attention Training Technique Reduce Stress in Students? A Controlled Study of Stress Appraisals and Meta-Worry.
n = 46
Finding: In this controlled trial, 46 stressed university students were split into two groups: half practised the Attention Training Technique for 12 minutes a day over four weeks, while the other half waited. Those who practised reported clearly lower everyday stress and less worrying-about-worrying than the group who didn't, with sizeable improvements from start to finish. For someone considering the practice, this suggests a short, daily attention routine may help loosen the grip of a racing, self-monitoring mind. Keep in mind this was a small, four-week study in students, so it's an encouraging early signal rather than proof it works for everyone.
reported narratively
The attention training technique, self-focused attention, and anxiety: a laboratory-based component study.
2014
Finding: In a laboratory experiment, adults were randomly assigned to try the Attention Training Technique, a mindfulness task, or a simple distraction task after being prompted to worry. Compared with the other approaches, the attention training exercise pulled focus outward and away from self-monitoring, and among people who were most caught up in themselves it produced the largest drop in that inward focus along with a bigger easing of anxious thinking. For someone practising it, this suggests the technique may help interrupt the loop of turning attention onto your own worries and redirect it outward. Keep in mind this was a single session with healthy volunteers in a controlled setting, so it shows how the exercise works in the moment rather than proving lasting or clinical benefit.
See full citation in referencesATT was created by clinical psychologist Adrian Wells in 1990 as a component of metacognitive therapy, an approach built on his Self-Regulatory Executive Function model of how worry and rumination are maintained (Wells, 1990), (Myhr et al., 2019). Its roots are clinical rather than spiritual or contemplative, and those roots help explain the practice's form, the deliberate sequencing of focused, switching, and divided attention, not its clinical effects.
For most healthy adults, the Attention Training Technique is a low-risk listening exercise, and the studies reviewed here reported no adverse effects. A few situations still warrant care. Its evidence is promising but uneven, so it works best as a skill you build over time rather than a standalone treatment. One controlled trial found it no better than a comparison exercise for easing worry in adults with probable generalized anxiety disorder, the persistent, hard-to-switch-off worrying that keeps circling back (Stewart et al., 2021). A single session also did not change how intense pain felt or how long it could be tolerated (Sharpe et al., 2010). If you are managing a diagnosed mental-health or pain condition, use the exercise alongside professional care rather than in place of it.
Anyone managing a diagnosed mental-health condition, such as an anxiety disorder or depression, should treat this practice as a complement to professional treatment rather than a substitute, since the evidence for it as a standalone therapy is still limited. People living with more serious conditions, including psychosis or trauma-related intrusive thoughts that can surface distressing material, have generally used the exercise within a clinical setting guided by a trained professional, and that support is the safer route. And if turning attention toward your own thoughts and worries tends to leave you feeling more distressed rather than steadier, it is reasonable to pause and check in with a clinician.
The evidence for ATT as a standalone treatment is still limited, so if you are being treated for anxiety or depression, use the exercise to support professional care rather than replace it, and talk with your clinician about how it fits your plan (Stewart et al., 2021), (Knowles et al., 2016).
| Technique | Best for | Use with care | Evidence strength | Distinction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mindful Self-Compassion (MSC) | People whose distress centers on harsh self-criticism and who want a warmer, self-kindness-based approach. | moderate EVIDENCE | MSC uses guided meditation and exercises to cultivate warmth and kindness toward oneself, aiming at how you relate emotionally to your own suffering. ATT is a neutral auditory attention drill that trains where focus goes, not the emotional tone you take toward yourself. The two target different levers: self-relating warmth versus attentional control. | |
| Mindfulness meditation | People drawn to a contemplative practice cultivating present-moment acceptance across body and mind. | Mindfulness invites turning toward inner experience, which some highly ruminative people find keeps attention inward; ATT's external focus may suit them better. | moderate EVIDENCE |
No. ATT is a secular attention drill, not meditation or relaxation. It is a guided listening exercise that has you focus on, switch between, and divide attention across sounds, deliberately pushing focus outward rather than inducing calm (Knowles et al., 2016).
+
No. ATT comes from Adrian Wells' metacognitive therapy, a talking-therapy approach rather than a contemplative tradition, and it works by training flexible, voluntary control of attention across competing sounds instead of cultivating calm or acceptance (Knowles et al., 2016), (Myhr et al., 2019). It usually feels effortful, more like a workout for attention than a wind-down, and it was developed partly for people in whom relaxation can paradoxically raise anxiety (Wells, 1990). It can share attentional mechanisms with mindfulness but differs in both vehicle and rationale.
Because ATT is active attention training, not a relaxation exercise. Deliberately focusing on, switching between, and dividing attention across competing sounds is meant to feel like a workout for your focus, so the effort is the practice working, not a sign you are doing it wrong (Haukaas et al., 2018).
+
Because ATT deliberately exercises your attention rather than winding you down. The exercise asks you to hold focus on one sound, switch between sounds on cue, and then try to take them all in at once, increasingly demanding tasks that train flexible, voluntary control over where your attention goes (Knowles et al., 2016), (Haukaas et al., 2018). That mental stretch is the training itself, and the sense of steadier, easier-to-redirect focus tends to build with repeated practice rather than arriving in one relaxed session (Fernie et al., 2019).
Worrying about your own worrying, the second layer of anxiety that comments on how much or how uncontrollably you worry. It often feels like an anxious voice narrating your anxiety and making it compound on itself.
Negative metacognitive appraisal of one's own worry process, a central maintaining factor in the metacognitive model of anxiety.
Attention turned inward onto your own thoughts, feelings, and bodily sensations rather than the world around you. When it locks in, it feels like being trapped inside your own head, monitoring for threat.
Heightened internal attentional focus implicated in the onset and maintenance of anxiety and depressive disorders; a primary target of ATT.
The capacity to keep attention on a chosen target and to move it deliberately from one thing to another. Strengthened, it feels like being able to unhook focus from a worry and place it where you want.
Top-down, voluntary regulation of attentional selection and shifting; gains in this capacity co-vary with symptom improvement in ATT studies.
Beliefs about your own thinking, such as the conviction that worry is uncontrollable or that it cannot be switched off. ATT aims to challenge these by giving direct proof that attention can be steered on purpose.
Beliefs about the meaning, controllability, and danger of cognitive processes; a core treatment target in Wells' metacognitive model.
Sensing and attending to the outside world through the five senses, especially, in ATT, the sounds around you. It shows up as the environment feeling more vivid and present as inward rumination loosens.
Conscious perception of external sensory stimuli, contrasted with interoceptive awareness of internal body states; used in ATT as an external attentional anchor.
Peter Myhr, Timo Hursti, Katarina Emanuelsson, Elina Löfgren, Odin Hjemdal, Myhr Peter (2019). Can the Attention Training Technique Reduce Stress in Students? A Controlled Study of Stress Appraisals and Meta-Worry.. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01532
Cited in: Benefits, Faq, Research, Roots and tradition
Thomas A. Fergus, Nancy E. Wheless, Lindsay C. Wright, Fergus Thomas A, Wheless Nancy E, Wright Lindsay C (2014). The attention training technique, self-focused attention, and anxiety: a laboratory-based component study.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2014.08.007
Explore guided sessions to deepen your Attention Training Technique technique.
Outcomes measured
| Outcome | Effect size | 95% CI | N | Comparator | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| treatment gains across RCTs | adjusted Cohen's d range = 0.4 | — | — | reference groups | Knowles et al., 2016 |
| frontoparietal alpha/beta oscillations | reported significant; p<0.005 | — | — | passive/control condition | Knowles & Wells, 2018 |
The main limitations are small sample sizes, a reliance on single-case and analogue designs, and participant groups that are often students or nonclinical volunteers rather than diagnosed patients, which limits how far results generalize. Some studies report only statistical significance rather than full effect-size estimates, and null findings, including no benefit over control for worry in probable generalized anxiety disorder and no change in pain, temper the otherwise encouraging picture (Stewart et al., 2021), (Sharpe et al., 2010), (Fergus et al., 2018).
The attention training technique causally reduces self-focus following worry provocation and reduces cognitive anxiety among self-focused individuals.
n = 133
Finding: In a single-session laboratory study with 133 nonclinical adults, people were guided through a worry episode and then randomly given attention training, a mindfulness task, or a simple distraction task. Attention training produced large reductions in self-focused attention, the inward "stuck in your own head" style of worry, and among those who started out most self-focused it eased anxious thinking more than distraction did. In practical terms, this suggests the technique can help pull your attention outward, away from spinning worry, at least in the moment. Because this was a brief one-time session with people who did not have a diagnosed anxiety disorder, it does not tell us whether the benefits hold up over weeks of practice or in a clinical setting.
reported narratively
A Systematic Review of Efficacy of the Attention Training Technique in Clinical and Nonclinical Samples.
n = 295
Finding: This review gathered 10 studies covering 295 people, some with anxiety or depression and some without, and found that the Attention Training Technique produced large improvements in anxiety and depressive symptoms, with people who practised it generally gaining more than those in comparison groups. For someone considering ATT, that points to a short, structured listening exercise that may meaningfully ease anxiety and low mood, likely by rebuilding flexible control over where attention goes rather than by dwelling on worried, self-focused thoughts. The studies were small and preliminary, though, so ATT is best seen as a promising skill to build alongside other support rather than a proven stand-alone treatment.
reported narratively
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Attention Training Technique and Mindful Self-Compassion for Students With Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety
2018
Finding: In this trial, university students practised the Attention Training Technique, a roughly 12-minute guided listening exercise that has you focus on, switch between, and hold several sounds at once. Of everything the researchers tracked, gains in how flexibly people could steer their attention were the single factor that predicted who improved, which points to trainable attention control, rather than relaxation, as the working ingredient. Because this was a short study in healthy students, it tells us more about how the practice works than about long-term benefits for other groups.
See full citation in referencesA randomized experimental analysis of the attention training technique: Effects on worry and relevant processes in individuals with probable generalized anxiety disorder.
n = 78
Finding: In a controlled trial with 78 adults who likely had generalized anxiety disorder, one week of daily Attention Training practice reduced worry no more than a comparison exercise did; people in both groups improved by a similar amount. For someone hoping this short listening practice will quiet chronic, excessive worry, that is a sobering result: at least over a single week, it did not outperform the control. Keep in mind this was a brief, one-week test in a specific anxious population, so it speaks to short-term worry rather than to how the practice might affect attention or well-being over longer, more consistent use.
reported narratively
Neural correlates of the attention training technique as used in metacognitive therapy - A randomized sham-controlled fMRI study in healthy volunteers.
n = 54
Finding: In a brain-imaging study with 54 healthy adults, one week of the Attention Training Technique helped people shift their attention away from one sound and onto another more quickly than a look-alike sham exercise, and scans showed less effort in a brain region tied to attentional control while they did so, a sign of more flexible, less effortful attention. The gains were specific: this practice did not measurably improve how well people focused on a single sound, held information in mind, or resisted distraction. Because everyone in the study was already healthy and the training lasted only a week, these results point to how ATT may sharpen attention-shifting rather than promising broader mental-health benefits.
reported narratively
Impact of a brief auditory attention training on a modified colour-word Stroop task in a high anxiety and worry sample
2019
Finding: In a controlled trial with 46 adults who tend toward high worry and anxiety, a single session of the Attention Training Technique measurably strengthened people's control over where they placed their attention, with the clearest gains when the task was visually demanding and hard to focus on. This suggests that even one guided listening session can start to build the mental "muscle" for steering attention on purpose rather than getting pulled toward whatever feels most distracting. Keep in mind this was a one-off lab session with a small group of non-clinical volunteers, so it shows the technique can shift attention in the moment rather than proving lasting change from regular practice.
See full citation in referencesInvestigating the Neural Correlates of the Attention Training Technique Using a Novel <scp>fMRI</scp> Paradigm for Measuring Attentional Control
2025
Finding: Using a brain scanner, this study watched what happened while people listened to the Attention Training Technique, and found it switched on the network of frontal and parietal brain regions that help you steer and hold your focus. In practical terms, the exercise appears to work the same circuitry you rely on to direct attention, which fits the idea that ATT is a workout for that control system rather than just a relaxation break. The study looked at healthy adults and measured brain activity only, so it shows the technique engages these attention circuits but not that it improves anxiety, mood, or any specific condition.
See full citation in referencesEffects of attention training technique on brain function in high- and low-cognitive-attentional syndrome individuals: Regional dynamics before, during, and after a single session of ATT.
2020
Finding: In this double-blind brain-imaging study of 89 adults who varied in how much they got caught in worry and repetitive self-focus, a single session of the Attention Training Technique shifted patterns of communication between brain regions but produced no measurable change in behaviour or attention on the day. In practical terms, one session may start to move something at the neural level, yet that alone does not translate into noticeable shifts in how you feel or act. The takeaway is that this practice is likely something that needs regular repetition rather than a one-off exercise, and because this trial tested only a single session, it tells us nothing about what steady practice over weeks might do.
See full citation in referencesMechanisms of Change During Attention Training and Mindfulness in High Trait-Anxious Individuals: A Randomized Controlled Study.
2017
Finding: In a controlled experiment, researchers pitted the Attention Training Technique against a mindfulness-based relaxation practice and a comparison group that simply let the mind wander, tracking how each affected anxiety and the mental habits behind it, such as the ability to step back from worried thoughts and shift attention more freely. Because it used a comparison group, this kind of study is designed to show whether any benefit comes from the attention training itself rather than from resting or from simply expecting to feel better. The specific size and direction of the results aren't detailed here, so this is best read as an early head-to-head test of the approach rather than a settled promise of a particular outcome.
See full citation in referencesEfficacy of metacognitive therapy in improving mental health: A meta‐analysis of single‐case studies
n = 53
Finding: This review pooled 14 single-case studies covering 53 patients and found large improvements in depression, anxiety, and other distressing symptoms after metacognitive therapy and its attention training component, with about 77% of people counted as recovered or holding onto their gains when checked at follow-up. For someone considering attention training, that points to real potential as part of a structured approach to managing persistent worry and low mood. Keep in mind that these were small, individually tracked cases rather than large controlled trials, and the results mostly reflect the broader therapy package; attention training on its own was not shown to drive the effect, so it is best seen as one promising ingredient rather than a proven stand-alone treatment.
reported narratively
Neurophysiological correlates of the attention training technique: A component study
2018
Finding: Using a wearable brain-imaging method that tracks blood flow, this study watched what happened in the brains of healthy adults as they practised the Attention Training Technique. Blood flow rose in regions on the right side and front of the brain that manage focus and executive control, the same circuitry we lean on to steer attention and pull ourselves out of repetitive worry. That fits the idea that this practice actively exercises your attention-control system rather than just relaxing you. Keep in mind it was a small session-based study in healthy volunteers, so it shows the technique switches on these attention networks but does not on its own prove it improves mood, rumination, or any clinical outcome.
See full citation in referencesSingle Dose of the Attention Training Technique Increases Resting Alpha and Beta-Oscillations in Frontoparietal Brain Networks: A Randomized Controlled Comparison
2018
Finding: In a small study, 36 healthy adults were randomly assigned either to actively practise the Attention Training Technique or to simply listen passively, and only the active group showed a measurable rise in the brain's alpha and beta activity across the frontal and parietal regions that handle focused attention. In plain terms, deliberately steering your attention during the exercise switched on the brain's attention-control circuitry in a way that passive listening did not. This was a single session with a small group of healthy, first-time participants, so it shows the technique engages the expected brain systems rather than proving any lasting mood or clinical benefit.
reported significant; p<0.005
The Attention Training Technique improves Children's ability to delay gratification: A controlled comparison with progressive relaxation
n = 101
Finding: In a controlled trial with 101 children aged 5 to 6, those who practised the Attention Training Technique became noticeably better at waiting for a reward than children who did progressive muscle relaxation or nothing at all, and they also improved at holding back an automatic verbal response, something relaxation did not do. This points to a specific self-control benefit from training attention rather than simply relaxing the body, hinting that where you place your focus, not just how calm you feel, may be what strengthens patience and impulse control. The finding comes from young children in a school setting, so it speaks to early self-regulation and should not be stretched to adult stress or clinical outcomes.
reported narratively
A comparison of the effect of attention training and relaxation on responses to pain
2010
Finding: In this study, 103 undergraduate students tried a single session of attention training before holding a hand in painfully cold water. The one session shifted how they paid attention, easing the tendency to fixate on the threat and monitor their own bodily sensations, but it did not change how intense the pain felt or how long they could tolerate it. For someone considering this practice, the takeaway is that a single sitting may adjust where your attention goes without yet changing the experience of pain itself. Because this was a one-off session with young, healthy volunteers, it suggests brief single-dose practice is likely not enough on its own, and regular repetition may be needed before broader effects show up.
See full citation in referencesThe Effectiveness of the Attention Training Technique in Reducing Intrusive Thoughts in Schizophrenia
2011
Finding: This case study followed one woman with schizophrenia through the Attention Training Technique, a set of listening exercises that shift focus away from inward, self-monitoring attention and build the ability to steer attention deliberately, with home practice to carry the skill into daily life. Over the course of the work, she experienced fewer of the intrusive thoughts that had been troubling her day to day. Because this is a single person's experience rather than a controlled trial, it can't tell us how well the technique works across people, but it offers an early, encouraging picture of ATT as a way to loosen the grip of unwanted thoughts. Treat it as one promising story, not proof of a treatment.
See full citation in referencesComparison of Attention Training and Cognitive Therapy in the Treatment of Social Phobia: A Preliminary Investigation
2012
Finding: This study looked at Attention Training for people who struggle with social anxiety, testing the idea that learning to steer attention outward, rather than getting caught up in monitoring yourself, can ease the self-consciousness that fuels social fear. For someone considering the practice, the takeaway is practical: the technique trains where you place your attention in social moments, which is one of the mechanisms thought to keep social anxiety going. Because the specific outcome measures and effect sizes for this particular study are not available here, treat it as one early piece of evidence rather than proof of a set benefit, and note that the findings apply to people dealing with social anxiety specifically.
See full citation in referencesEffects of attention training on hypochondriasis: a brief case series
1998
Finding: This small case series followed three people struggling with intense health worries as they practised the Attention Training Technique, and each showed clear improvements in mood and in the anxious, illness-focused thoughts that had been troubling them, with those gains still holding six months later. For someone drawn to this practice, it hints that deliberately redirecting attention may loosen the grip of repetitive worry over time. Because only three individuals were tracked and there was no comparison group, this is an early, promising signal rather than proof that the technique treats health anxiety.
See full citation in referencesAttention Training Reduces Intrusive Thoughts Cued by a Narrative of Stressful Life Events: A Controlled Study
2013
Finding: In this controlled study, adults troubled by distressing intrusive thoughts practised the Attention Training Technique across two sessions plus homework before listening back to a recording of a stressful experience; those who trained had far fewer unwanted thoughts afterward, roughly 3.4 times the drop seen in the comparison group, along with a greater ability to shift and direct their attention at will. For someone who finds the same upsetting thoughts replaying after a hard event, this suggests that deliberately practising where you place your attention may loosen those thoughts' grip fairly quickly. Keep in mind this was a brief study that used a recording to bring intrusions to the surface rather than tracking people through real-life distress over time, so it points to early promise rather than a settled result.
reported narratively
Panic disorder in association with relaxation induced anxiety: An attentional training approach to treatment
1990
Finding: This 1990 report from psychologist Adrian Wells introduced Attention Training Technique through a single patient with panic disorder whose anxiety was actually triggered by relaxation; when the patient practised focusing attention outward onto everyday sounds, the panic attacks stopped. It marks the technique's origin as a deliberate attention-shifting method within what became metacognitive therapy, rather than a practice drawn from any contemplative or religious tradition. Because this is one early case rather than a controlled trial, it is best read as the starting point of the method, not proof of how well it works across people.
See full citation in referencesOne controlled trial found ATT no better than a comparison exercise for easing the persistent, hard-to-switch-off worrying that keeps circling back in probable generalized anxiety disorder, so don't rely on it as a worry treatment on its own (Stewart et al., 2021).
People living with more serious conditions, including psychosis or trauma-related intrusions that can surface distressing material, have generally used ATT within a clinical setting guided by a trained professional. That support is the safer route rather than practising alone (Nassif & Wells, 2013), (Levaux et al., 2011).
If turning attention toward your own thoughts and worries consistently leaves you more distressed rather than steadier, stop the session and, where needed, reach out to a mental-health professional before continuing.
A single ATT session did not change how intense pain felt or how long it could be tolerated, so if you are managing a pain condition, use the exercise alongside professional care rather than as a pain intervention (Sharpe et al., 2010).
The Attention Training Technique works best as a skill you build gradually rather than a quick fix, so it helps to approach it as a short audio-style listening exercise you return to regularly over days and weeks. A sensible starting format is around twelve minutes in a quiet, undisturbed spot where a few everyday sounds naturally overlap, giving your attention room to settle and something to steer between. If you are managing a diagnosed condition, lean on it as a support alongside professional care rather than a replacement for it.
Give yourself roughly 12 minutes somewhere you will not be disturbed, so attention has room to settle instead of being pulled away by interruptions.
Choose a setting where a few different noises overlap naturally, such as traffic, a clock, or distant voices. The exercise trains attention by working across competing sounds, so you need more than one to steer between.
Start by holding focus on one sound while the others continue, then shift focus between sounds on cue, and finally try to take in all the sounds at once. It will feel effortful at first; that mental stretch is the training, not a sign anything is wrong.
When your focus drifts to a worry, return it to the sounds without judging yourself. The aim is flexible steering, the sense that you can redirect attention on purpose, not perfect concentration.
Benefits build with repetition over days and weeks, so approach ATT as gradual attention training rather than a one-time fix. Consistency matters more than any single session.
If you are being treated for anxiety, depression, pain, or another condition, use the exercise to support that care and talk with your clinician about how it fits your plan.
If practice consistently leaves you more anxious or surfaces upsetting thoughts, stop the session and, where needed, reach out to a mental-health professional.
This information is educational and is not medical advice. This practice is not a substitute for professional care and should not replace prescribed medication or treatment for any medical or mental-health condition. If you are managing a health condition or taking medication, talk with a qualified health professional before changing your practice. If you are in distress or crisis, seek professional support.
| Mindfulness cultivates open, nonjudgmental awareness of whatever arises, including inner experience, as a stance of acceptance. ATT deliberately pushes attention outward onto external sounds and rehearses selecting, switching, and dividing focus, treating attention as a controllable skill rather than an accepting posture. They can share attentional mechanisms while offering very different vehicles and rationales. |
| Progressive Muscle Relaxation (PMR) | People who carry stress as physical tension and want a somatic wind-down. | For some panic-prone people, relaxation can paradoxically raise anxiety, which is part of why ATT was originally created. | moderate EVIDENCE | PMR works through the body, tensing and releasing muscle groups to produce physical relaxation. ATT leaves the body alone and trains attention; relaxation is not its goal. This distinction is historically pointed, since ATT was developed partly for people in whom relaxation can paradoxically increase anxiety. |
| Cognitive Therapy | People who want to examine and challenge the specific beliefs or automatic thoughts driving distress. | strong EVIDENCE | Cognitive therapy changes the content of thoughts, testing and reframing what you believe. ATT changes your relationship to attention itself, leaving thought content largely untouched while training where focus lands and how flexibly it moves. One works on what you think, the other on where you attend. |
| Attentional Bias Modification (ABM) | Research and clinical contexts targeting implicit, threat-related attention biases. | ABM's clinical effects have been modest and inconsistent across meta-analytic review. | emerging EVIDENCE | ABM uses computerized tasks to retrain automatic, largely unconscious attention biases toward or away from threat cues. ATT trains conscious, voluntary control of attention through a listening exercise. The two share the word attention but target different levels of processing, implicit bias versus deliberate control. |
Partly, and the support is promising rather than proven. A systematic review and a single-case meta-analysis report sizable reductions in anxiety and depressive symptoms, and one controlled trial linked ATT to less worry-about-worry in stressed students (Knowles et al., 2016), (Rochat et al., 2017), (Myhr et al., 2019).
+
Partly. A systematic review of ten studies and a single-case meta-analysis both found sizable improvements in anxiety and depressive symptoms, and a controlled trial linked ATT to lower perceived stress and less worry-about-worry, the habit of worrying about how much you worry, in stressed students (Knowles et al., 2016), (Rochat et al., 2017), (Myhr et al., 2019). The picture is encouraging but not settled: one randomized trial found ATT no better than a comparison exercise for worry in adults with probable generalized anxiety disorder, and most samples are small or nonclinical (Stewart et al., 2021), (Fergus et al., 2018). It is best seen as a trainable attention skill with promising direct support, not a proven standalone treatment.
Suggestive but still early. A systematic review of 10 small studies and a single-case meta-analysis link ATT to moderate-to-large improvements in anxiety and depression, but most samples are small or nonclinical and some trials show no benefit (Knowles et al., 2016), (Rochat et al., 2017), (Stewart et al., 2021).
+
The evidence is encouraging but not yet settled. A systematic review of 10 studies with 295 participants and a single-case meta-analysis both report sizable gains for anxiety and depression, with most patients recovered or holding their gains at follow-up (Knowles et al., 2016), (Rochat et al., 2017). Those findings are tempered by small, often nonclinical or single-case samples, plus null results: one controlled trial found ATT no better than a comparison for worry in adults with probable generalized anxiety disorder, the persistent worrying that is hard to switch off, and a single session did not change pain (Stewart et al., 2021), (Sharpe et al., 2010). Read it as an encouraging direction, not a proven standalone treatment.
Possibly, by treating attention as a trainable skill rather than curing worry outright. ATT is thought to loosen worry's grip by strengthening flexible control of attention and pulling focus outward, away from the inward threat-scanning that fuels worry (Haukaas et al., 2018), (Fergus et al., 2014). This mechanism is supported but not confirmed, and one trial found no worry benefit in probable generalized anxiety disorder (Stewart et al., 2021).
+
Possibly, and the proposed route is mechanical rather than magical. Repeatedly selecting, switching, and dividing attention across sounds trains flexible, voluntary attentional control, and in trials with students and high-worry adults, gains in that flexibility travelled alongside feeling better (Haukaas et al., 2018), (Fernie et al., 2019). A second proposed route is shifting attention outward, away from self-focused worry; lab studies show ATT can causally reduce that inward pull, though the link to lasting symptom change stays largely correlational (Fergus et al., 2014), (Fergus et al., 2018). This gives direct, felt evidence that attention is steerable, which can challenge the belief that worry is uncontrollable, but it does not reliably reduce worry for everyone: one controlled trial found no advantage over a comparison exercise for worry in adults with probable generalized anxiety disorder (Stewart et al., 2021).
Likely, with care. For most people ATT is a low-risk listening exercise with no adverse effects reported in the studies reviewed, but if you have diagnosed anxiety or depression, use it alongside professional care rather than in place of it, since standalone evidence is limited and mixed (Stewart et al., 2021).
+
Likely, with care. ATT is generally low-risk, and a systematic review points to promising, sizable effects for anxiety and depressive symptoms, though that evidence rests on small studies and is best treated as suggestive rather than confirmed (Knowles et al., 2016). It is not established as a standalone treatment: one controlled trial found it no better than a comparison exercise for easing worry in probable generalized anxiety disorder, the persistent, hard-to-switch-off worrying that keeps circling back (Stewart et al., 2021). If you are managing a diagnosed condition, treat ATT as a support alongside professional care, and pause and check in with a clinician if practice consistently leaves you more distressed.
Use care. For most healthy adults ATT is a low-risk listening exercise, and no adverse effects were reported in the studies reviewed. But if focusing on your own thoughts leaves you more distressed, or if you live with trauma-related intrusions or psychosis, pause and work with a clinician rather than practising alone.
+
Use care. ATT has been linked to fewer intrusive thoughts after distressing experiences, but that work is early and limited, and people with more serious conditions such as psychosis or trauma-related intrusions have generally used the exercise within professional care rather than on their own (Nassif & Wells, 2013), (Levaux et al., 2011). The wider evidence is encouraging but built on small studies, so ATT is best treated as a skill you build alongside professional support, not a treatment for distressing thoughts (Knowles et al., 2016), (Rochat et al., 2017). If turning attention toward your own thoughts consistently raises distress, stop the session and check in with a mental-health professional.
About 12 minutes. A single ATT session runs roughly 12 minutes across three attentional phases, focusing on one sound, switching between sounds, then dividing attention (Haukaas et al., 2018). Frequency is practice-informed rather than fixed: it is treated as a skill you build with regular repetition over days and weeks.
+
About 12 minutes per session, moving through the three timed attentional modes of focusing on one sound, switching between sounds on cue, and dividing focus across several at once (Knowles et al., 2016), (Haukaas et al., 2018). No trial has established an optimal dose for frequency, so the practical guidance is to practise regularly and treat it as gradual attention training rather than a one-time fix. Because a set number of sessions has not been shown to produce a fixed result, approach repetition as skill-building rather than a prescribed course.
Both work with attention, but differently. Mindfulness cultivates open, accepting awareness of whatever arises inside and out, while ATT is a structured listening drill that pushes attention outward onto competing sounds and treats focus as a steerable skill. They can share attentional mechanisms while using very different methods.
+
They overlap in working with attention but differ in method and stance. Mindfulness invites turning toward inner experience with acceptance, whereas ATT deliberately directs attention outward onto everyday sounds and rehearses selecting, switching, and dividing focus, which can help loosen self-focused worry (Fergus et al., 2014), (Fergus et al., 2018). Because ATT trains flexible, voluntary control of attention (Haukaas et al., 2018), its external emphasis may suit minds that stay stuck inward. A randomized comparison suggests the two approaches may work through different mechanisms rather than one outperforming the other, and neither is a proven standalone treatment (McEvoy et al., 2017).
The brain system spanning frontal and parietal regions that directs and holds voluntary attention. Stronger engagement is often felt as attention being easier to steer, so moving focus off a worry takes a little less effort.
Large-scale fronto-parietal network supporting top-down attentional control; associated with increased alpha and beta oscillatory activity following ATT.
A brain region that acts as a conflict monitor, flagging when attention is being pulled in competing directions. Altered activity here may feel like attention shifts becoming less of a mental tug-of-war.
Cortical hub for conflict monitoring and attentional disengagement; showed altered activation after ATT in a sham-controlled fMRI study.
The three timed phases of ATT: holding focus on one sound while others continue, shifting focus between sounds on cue, and trying to hold several sounds at once. Together they rehearse steering attention by choice.
The three sequential attentional modes of the roughly 12-minute ATT auditory exercise, structured to increase task demand.
Cited in: Faq, How it works, Research
Thomas A. Fergus, Nancy E. Wheless, Fergus Thomas A, Wheless Nancy E (2018). The attention training technique causally reduces self-focus following worry provocation and reduces cognitive anxiety among self-focused individuals.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.06.006
Cited in: Faq, How it works, Research
Mark M. Knowles, Philip Foden, Wael El‐Deredy, Adrian Wells, M. Knowles, P. Foden (2016). A Systematic Review of Efficacy of the Attention Training Technique in Clinical and Nonclinical Samples.. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22312
Cited in: Benefits, Faq, Research, Use with care, What it is
Ragni Bleie Haukaas, Ingrid Bondkall Gjerde, Grunde Varting, Håvard Engen Hallan, Stian Solem (2018). A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Attention Training Technique and Mindful Self-Compassion for Students With Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00827
Cited in: Comparison, Faq, How it works, Research, What it is
Kathleen E. Stewart, Martin M. Antony, Naomi Koerner, Stewart Kathleen E, Antony Martin M, Koerner Naomi (2021). A randomized experimental analysis of the attention training technique: Effects on worry and relevant processes in individuals with probable generalized anxiety disorder.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2021.103863
Cited in: Benefits, Faq, Research, Use with care, What it is
Niklas Jahn, Christopher Sinke, Özlem Kayali, Svenja Krug, Erik Leichter, Stephanie Peschel (2023). Neural correlates of the attention training technique as used in metacognitive therapy - A randomized sham-controlled fMRI study in healthy volunteers.. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1084022
Cited in: Research, What happens in the body
Bruce A. Fernie, Marcantonio M. Spada, Richard G. Brown (2019). Impact of a brief auditory attention training on a modified colour-word Stroop task in a high anxiety and worry sample. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2019.1612408
Cited in: Faq, How it works, Research
Kristina Schwarz, Adrian Wells, Franziska Giller, Tanja Endraß, Schwarz Kristina, Wells Adrian (2025). Investigating the Neural Correlates of the Attention Training Technique Using a Novel <scp>fMRI</scp> Paradigm for Measuring Attentional Control. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.70416
Cited in: Research, What happens in the body
Joachim Kowalski, Małgorzata Wierzba, Marek Wypych, Artur Marchewka, Małgorzata Dragan, Kowalski Joachim (2020). Effects of attention training technique on brain function in high- and low-cognitive-attentional syndrome individuals: Regional dynamics before, during, and after a single session of ATT.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2020.103693
Cited in: Research
Peter M. McEvoy, Rachel Graville, Sarra Hayes, Robert Kane, Jonathan K. Foster, McEvoy Peter M (2017). Mechanisms of Change During Attention Training and Mindfulness in High Trait-Anxious Individuals: A Randomized Controlled Study.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2017.04.001
Cited in: Comparison, Faq
Lucien Rochat, Rumen Manolov, Joël Billieux (2017). Efficacy of metacognitive therapy in improving mental health: A meta‐analysis of single‐case studies. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22567
David Rosenbaum, Moritz Julian Maier, Justin Hudak, Florian G. Metzger, Adrian Wells, Andreas J. Fallgatter (2018). Neurophysiological correlates of the attention training technique: A component study. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2018.06.021
Cited in: Research, What happens in the body
Mark M. Knowles, Adrian Wells (2018). Single Dose of the Attention Training Technique Increases Resting Alpha and Beta-Oscillations in Frontoparietal Brain Networks: A Randomized Controlled Comparison. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01768
Cited in: Research, What happens in the body
Joanne Murray, Helen Scott, Claire M. Connolly, Adrian Wells (2018). The Attention Training Technique improves Children's ability to delay gratification: A controlled comparison with progressive relaxation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2018.02.003
Cited in: Comparison
Louise Sharpe, Nicholson K. Perry, Peter J. Rogers, Blake F. Dear, Michael K. Nicholas, Kathryn M. Refshauge (2010). A comparison of the effect of attention training and relaxation on responses to pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2010.05.027
Cited in: Comparison, Faq, Research, Use with care
Marie‐Noëlle Levaux, Frank Larøi, Isabelle Offerlin-Meyer, Jean‐Marie Danion, Martial Van der Linden (2011). The Effectiveness of the Attention Training Technique in Reducing Intrusive Thoughts in Schizophrenia. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534650111435696
Cited in: Benefits, Faq, Use with care
Juliet Donald, Maree J. Abbott, Evelyn Smith (2012). Comparison of Attention Training and Cognitive Therapy in the Treatment of Social Phobia: A Preliminary Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1352465812001051
Cited in: Comparison
Costas Papageorgiou, Adrian Wells (1998). Effects of attention training on hypochondriasis: a brief case series. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291797005825
Cited in: Benefits
Yasmine Nassif, Adrian Wells (2013). Attention Training Reduces Intrusive Thoughts Cued by a Narrative of Stressful Life Events: A Controlled Study. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22047
Cited in: Benefits, Faq, Use with care
Adrian Wells (1990). Panic disorder in association with relaxation induced anxiety: An attentional training approach to treatment. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0005-7894(05)80330-2
Cited in: Faq, Roots and tradition
Editorially curated. Tracks are not themselves clinically studied; evidence on the page applies to Attention Training Technique as a technique.
Beginner video for Attention Training Technique

★ 4.7
·
Guided
·
15 min
Patrick Kozakiewicz
How hard is Attention Training Technique?
Attention Training Technique is effortful mainly because the user has to actively steer attention through a clinical protocol.
3
Mental Effort
3 / 4
▾Emotional Depth
1 / 4
▾Physical Intensity
1 / 4
▾Prior Knowledge
2 / 4
▾