Today,
We're going to go back to the origin,
Though,
Because if you want to change a pattern this deep,
This insidious,
You need to understand where it came from.
This is not about blaming your parents.
It's not to go back and like relitigate your whole childhood.
But because your nervous system learned something specific in a specific environment and until you understand what it learned,
You can't teach it something different.
So everything starts here.
Attachment.
From the moment we're born,
We're wired it to attach,
Not because it feels nice or good,
But because it's survival.
An infant cannot feed itself,
Protect itself,
Regulate its own nervous system.
It needs a caregiver.
That need is biological.
It is not optional.
So the first question every child's nervous system is always asking is,
Am I safe with this person?
And the second question,
Which is just as urgent,
What do I need to do to keep them close?
Second question is nothing.
You just exist.
Your needs are met.
Your emotions are welcomed.
You can be upset and the caregiver stays.
You can be difficult and the love does not go away.
But when attachment is insecure,
Whether through the anxious variety or the avoidant variety,
When love feels conditional,
When a caregiver is inconsistent,
Critical,
Emotionally unavailable,
Or maybe only warm when the child performs a particular way,
The child's nervous system gets a very different answer.
The message,
It's not like spoken been out loud,
But the message is you're loved when you're easy.
You're safe when you don't cause problems.
You belong when you make me comfortable.
That is where people-pleasing is born.
From an attachment perspective,
People-pleasing is an anxious strategy.
The child who people-pleases is not a naturally compliant child.
They're a child whose nervous system learned that staying attuned to others,
Staying agreeable,
Staying small was the best available path to closeness.
And in that particular environment,
They're right.
But beyond attachment,
There's another layer,
And it's the role.
Family systems have their own kind of logic.
They function in their own kind of specific ways.
And in a lot of families,
Especially ones with high conflict,
Addiction,
Mental illness,
Emotional instability,
Or just high pressure,
Children get assigned roles.
It's not like a conversation like,
Hey,
You're going to do this role and you're going to do that role and I'm going to do this role.
It's not explicit,
But the family system shapes itself and the children find their place in it.
And some of the most common roles that produce people pleasers,
We see the peacekeeper.
This is the child who senses tension before anyone else does and moves immediately to defuse it.
They mediate between the parents.
They lighten the mood.
They never add to the burden because they can see how full everyone else already is.
Then you have the parentified child.
They take on the emotional or practical responsibility for a parent,
Becomes the one who listens,
Who comforts,
Who manages,
They learn to put someone else's needs above their own as a form of love,
And carries that template,
If you will,
Into every relationship that follows.
And then you see the good one.
In families with a sibling whose struggles are parents under enormous stress,
One child often becomes the one who never needs anything,
Who doesn't rock the boat,
Whose job unspoken,
It's not directly said to the kiddo about this,
But their job as that child,
The good one,
Is to be easy.
In IFS,
Or internal family systems,
We would say that the part of you that people pleases took on this role really early.
It believed with total sincerity that if it could just keep everyone comfortable,
The family would be okay,
And that part is still in there.
It's still working that job.
And it needs to know that the job is no longer yours to carry.
Here's what I want you to understand about why this is so hard to change just by deciding to change it.
These patterns don't live in the thinking brain,
The logical part of your brain.
They live in the body,
In the structures of the nervous system that operate right below conscious awareness.
The part of your brain that processes threat and drives survival responses doesn't update through insight.
It updates through experience.
So in my theology,
Work,
Which is a neuropsychotherapy approach that looks at how trauma and relational patterns get encoded in the nervous system.
We pay very close attention to this.
When we experience something repeatedly,
Especially in early childhood,
When the nervous system is still forming,
It doesn't just become a memory.
It becomes a template,
A pattern of activation that fires automatically when certain cues appear.
So when you are now an adult and someone expresses disappointment in you,
And you feel that immediate contraction,
That collapse,
That desperate need to fix it,
You're not being irrational.
You're running a program that was written decades ago in a body that was much smaller and in an environment where that program made complete sense.
Somatic work really matters here because the body is where the program runs.
Talk therapy helps you understand it cognitively,
Right?
But the body needs its own kind of update.
Learning slowly and safe relational experience experiences,
That it's okay to stay present when someone is upset,
That disappointing someone will not destroy that connection,
That your nervous system can come back to regulation even when the situation is hard.
You cannot think your way out of a pattern that your body encoded before you had language for it.
The healing has to go where the learning went,
Into the body,
Into the nervous system,
Into the places that words by themselves they can't reach.
So let me name some specific experiences because people pleasing doesn't come from one type of family.
It comes from a lot of different types of families and a lot of different types of environments.
Emotional neglect,
Not abuse.
Absence.
A parent who is physically present but emotionally unavailable.
Who didn't ask how you felt or maybe they dismissed it when you did share.
The child learns that my emotional world is not welcome here.
I'm going to manage it myself and I'm not going to burden anyone Then we see enmeshment.
This is a parent,
Often a mother,
Whose emotional world the child has to navigate constantly,
Where the child's job is to attune to the parent,
Not the other way around,
Where there is no clear boundary between where the parent ends and the child begins.
The child becomes a master at reading others and loses touch entirely with reading themselves,
Knowing their internal kind of landscape,
Knowing their own needs or what they're feeling.
Then we have conditional love.
Maybe this could also be rephrased as,
You know,
Maybe you're really good at chameleoning or being a chameleon.
You adapt to whatever you feel like they need so that you can be in good graces,
So that you can be loved,
So that you can be accepted and loved.
So that you can belong.
Religious or cultural conditioning.
This is big.
In many faith traditions and cultural context,
Compliance,
Selflessness,
And deference,
Especially for girls and women,
Are taught as virtues.
Putting yourself first is framed as sin or selfishness.
Having needs is shameful.
And this doesn't just come from a parent.
It comes from the entire environment,
The church,
The community,
The doctrine.
It's layered and it runs.
Deep.
Whatever your specific experience was,
You don't need to have had a terrible childhood for this to be real.
Emotional neglect is enough.
Enmeshment is enough.
Conditional warmth is enough.
The nervous system doesn't grade difficulty.
It just records what it learned.
Sometimes the trauma isn't so much about what was done to you.
Sometimes the trauma is also what didn't happen and should have.